Here is the exact Proposal 3 verbiage that will appear in the Michigan Constitution.
Important:The 95 words that appear on the Proposal 3 ballot are notthe same 343 words that will actually be permanently written into the Michigan Constitution.
Here are those 343 words: (Bold added by me)
ARTICLE I
DECLARATION OF RIGHTS
§ 28 Reproductive freedom.
(1) Every individual has a fundamental right to reproductive freedom, which entails the right to make and effectuate decisions about all matters relating to pregnancy, including but not limited to prenatal care, childbirth, postpartum care, contraception, sterilization, abortion care, miscarriage management, and infertility care.
An individual’s right to reproductive freedom shall not be denied,
burdened, nor infringed upon unless justified by a compelling state
interest achieved by the least restrictive means.
Notwithstanding the above, the state may regulate the provision of abortion care after fetal viability, provided that in no circumstance shall the state prohibit an abortion that, in the professional judgment of an attending health care professional, is medically indicated to protect the life or
physical or mental health of the pregnant individual.
(2) The state shall not discriminate in the protection or enforcement of this fundamental right.
(3) The state shall not penalize, prosecute, or otherwise take adverse
action against an individual based on their actual, potential, perceived, or alleged pregnancy outcomes, including but not limited to miscarriage,
stillbirth, or abortion. Nor shall the state penalize, prosecute, or otherwise take adverse action against someone for aiding or assisting a pregnant
individual in exercising their right to reproductive freedom with their
voluntary consent.
(4) For the purposes of this section: A state interest is “compelling” only if it is for the limited purpose of protecting the health of an individual seeking
care, consistent with accepted clinical standards of practice and
evidence based medicine, and does not infringe on that individual’s
autonomous decision making.
“Fetal viability” means: the point in pregnancy when, in the professional judgment of an attending health care professional and based on the
particular facts of the case, there is a significant likelihood of the fetus’s sustained survival outside the uterus without the application of
extraordinary medical measures.
(5) This section shall be self executing. Any provision of this section held invalid shall be severable from the remaining portions of this section.
Bob: Okay folks, that is the actual language that will appear in the Michigan Constitution if
Proposal 3 passes.
Remember, PROPOSAL 3: Mandates unrestricted abortion on demand up to the moment of birth
It eliminates all restrictions on abortion.
As quoted directly from Article 1, Section 28, which would be added to the Michigan Constitution….
The language specifically states that “every individual” (with no age minimum) “has a fundamental right to reproductive freedom, which entails the right to make an effectuate decisions about ALL matters relating to pregnancy”, and that this right “shall not be denied, burdened or infringed upon”.
Also, “The State shall not penalize, prosecute, or otherwise take adverse action against an individual based on their actual, potential, perceived, or alleged pregnancy outcomes”, or “against someone for aiding or assisting”. It also states that no law on “anything related to pregnancy” can infringe on a person’s “autonomous decision making”.
This would invalidate all existing Michigan abortion restriction laws such as Parental consent, waiting periods, informed consent, 3rd trimester bans, etc.
As a result of this proposal, thereby removing all abortion restrictions…..
Abortion centers would be allowed to set their OWN standards for health, safety and sanitation.
Untrained, non-medical persons would now be allowed to participate in abortions.
Babies that survive an abortion could be denied medical care if the woman and abortionist agree.
Christian doctors would lose their conscience rights to opt out of doing abortions.
Pro-abortion teachers would be allowed to take minors to get an abortion without telling mom or dad.
Statutory rape reporting would no longer be required.
Pregnant employees could now be discriminated against by pro-abortion employers.
Pregnant women would have and absolute right no make ANY decisions regarding pregnancy
……at any age with no minimum age restrictions.
The language would also apply to transgender surgery for minors, against the wishes of parents.
This would make Michigan the #1 most radically pro-abortion state in America, more so than California.
Being a Constitutional Amendment, this would make all of this a Constitutional “right”, making it nearly impossible for any Republican Legislature of Governor to undo it.
This Proposal is being dishonestly advertised as merely “Making Michigan Pro-Choice” and
“making Michigan how it was before Roe v Wade was overturned”. This is a lie. During Roe v Wade, all of the above common-sense restrictions were in place in Michigan. If Proposal 3 passes, these restrictions all go away. Polls consistently show that most “pro-choice” people support these basic restrictions and oppose unrestricted abortion through all 9 months. That’s what Proposal 3 does. It does NOT merely revert us back to “how things were under Roe v Wade”.
21 minute Video: A lawyer & a Doctor fact-checking 10 false claims about Proposal 3:
Here’s the 3 Michigan Proposals and why I’m a “No” vote on all 3:
PROPOSAL 1: Re-writes Michigan’s Term Limits Laws
Allows State Senators and Legislators to run a full 12 years in either Chamber, instead of the current Term Limit of 8 years in the Senate and 6 years in the House. While it lowers the overall combined Term Limits from 14 total combined years down to 12, most State politicians don’t actually serve full terms in both Chambers, so it serves to allow career politicians to stay in their current seat way longer than before. The Proposal is
deceptively written though to make it look like the average Term is being shortened.
PROPOSAL 2: Re-writes Michigan’s Voter Laws
This would change Michigan’s voter laws through a Constitutional Amendment to mimic California and make it way easier for Democrats to engage on voter fraud by:
Banning voter ID requirements
Expands Absentee & Mass Balloting that invites voter fraud
Places Drop Boxes throughout Michigan that invite voter fraud
Allows special interest and non-profit money to buy elections.
(Pro-life and Christian non-profits have way less money than the liberal non-profit groups of George Soros, Bill Gates, Hollywood, powerful unions, etc. All these groups would be able to flood Michigan elections with their money from all over the country)
Adds 9 days of early voting, an advantage to Democrats and fraud activists.
This would amend the Michigan Constitution, making it nearly impossible for a
Republican Secretary of State, Legislature, or Governor to undo it.
Strongly supported by the ACLU and the Democratic Party. (Need I say more)
PROPOSAL 3: Mandates unrestricted abortion on demand up to the moment of birth
It eliminates all restrictions on abortion.
As quoted directly from Article 1, Section 28, which would be added to the Michigan Constitution….
The language specifically states that “every individual” (with no age minimum) “has a fundamental right to reproductive freedom, which entails the right to make an effectuate decisions about ALL matters relating to pregnancy”, and that this right “shall not be denied, burdened or infringed upon”.
Also, “The State shall not penalize, prosecute, or otherwise take adverse action against an individual based on their actual, potential, perceived, or alleged pregnancy outcomes”, or “against someone for aiding or assisting”. It also states that no law on “anything related to pregnancy” can infringe on a person’s “autonomous decision making”.
This would invalidate all existing Michigan abortion restriction laws such as Parental consent, waiting periods, informed consent, 3rd trimester bans, etc.
As a result of this proposal, thereby removing all abortion restrictions…..
Abortion centers would be allowed to set their OWN standards for health, safety and sanitation.
Untrained, non-medical persons would now be allowed to participate in abortions.
Babies that survive an abortion could be denied medical care if the woman and abortionist agree.
Christian doctors would lose their conscience rights to opt out of doing abortions.
Pro-abortion teachers would be allowed to take minors to get an abortion without telling mom or dad.
Statutory rape reporting would no longer be required.
Pregnant employees could now be discriminated against by pro-abortion employers.
Pregnant women would have and absolute right no make ANY decisions regarding pregnancy
……at any age with no minimum age restrictions.
The language would also apply to transgender surgery for minors, against the wishes of parents.
This would make Michigan the #1 most radically pro-abortion state in America, more so than California.
Being a Constitutional Amendment, this would make all of this a Constitutional “right”, making it nearly impossible for any Republican Legislature of Governor to undo it.
This Proposal is being dishonestly advertised as merely “Making Michigan Pro-Choice” and
“making Michigan how it was before Roe v Wade was overturned”. This is a lie. During Roe v Wade, all of the above common-sense restrictions were in place in Michigan. If Proposal 3 passes, these restrictions all go away. Polls consistently show that most “pro-choice” people support these basic restrictions and oppose unrestricted abortion through all 9 months. That’s what Proposal 3 does. It does NOT merely revert us back to “how things were under Roe v Wade”.
21 minute Video: A lawyer & a Doctor fact-checking 10 false claims about Proposal 3:
Here’s the 3 Michigan Proposals and why I’m a “No” vote on all 3:
PROPOSAL 1: Re-writes Michigan’s Term Limits Laws
Allows State Senators and Legislators to run a full 12 years in either Chamber, instead of the current Term Limit of 8 years in the Senate and 6 years in the House. While it lowers the overall combined Term Limits from 14
total combined years down to 12, most State politicians don’t actually serve full terms in both Chambers, so it serves to allow career politicians to stay in their current seat way longer than before. The Proposal is
deceptively written though to make it look like the average Term is being shortened.
PROPOSAL 2: Re-writes Michigan’s Voter Laws
This would change Michigan’s voter laws through a Constitutional Amendment to mimic California and make it way easier for Democrats to engage in voter fraud in these ways:
• Banning voter ID requirements
• Expands Absentee & Mass Balloting that invites voter fraud
• Permanently Places Drop Boxes throughout Michigan that invite voter fraud
• Allows special interest and non-profit money to buy elections.
(Pro-life and Christian non-profits have way less money than the liberal non-profit groups of George Soros, Bill Gates, Hollywood, powerful unions, etc. All these groups would be able to flood Michigan elections with their money from all over the country)
• Adds 9 days of early voting, an advantage to Democrats and fraud activists.
• This would amend the Michigan Constitution, making it nearly impossible for a Republican Secretary of State, Legislature, or Governor to undo it.
• Strongly supported by the ACLU and the Democratic Party. (Need I say more)
PROPOSAL 3: Mandates unrestricted abortion on demand up to the moment of birth
• Eliminates all restrictions on abortion
Article 1, Section 28 of the Michigan Constitution would add this language:
The language specifically states that “EVERY individual”(with no age minimum) “has a
fundamental right to reproductive freedom, which entails the right to make and effectuate
decisions about ALL matters relating to pregnancy”, and that this right “shall not be denied, burdened or infringed upon”. Also, “The State shall not penalize, prosecute, or otherwise take adverse action against an individual based on their actual, potential, PERCEIVED, or ALLEGED PREGNANCY OUTCOMES”, or “against someone for aiding or assisting”. It also states that no law on “ANYTHING related to pregnancy, including……..sterilization” can infringe on a person’s “autonomous decision making”.
This would invalidate all existing Michigan abortion restriction laws such as Parental consent, waiting
periods, informed consent, 3rd trimester bans, etc.
Other changes this Proposal would cause:
• Abortion centers would be allowed to set their OWN standards for health, safety and sanitation.
• Untrained, non-medical persons would now be allowed to participate in abortions.
• Babies that survive an abortion could be denied medical care if the woman and abortionist agree.
• Christian doctors would lose their conscience rights to opt out of doing abortions.
• Pro-abortion teachers would be allowed to take minors to get an abortion without telling mom or dad.
• Statutory rape reporting would no longer be required.
• Pregnant employees could now be discriminated against by pro-abortion employers.
• Pregnant women would have and absolute right to make ANY decisions regarding pregnancy ……at any age with no minimum age restrictions.
• The language would also apply to transgender surgery for minors, against the wishes of parents.
• This would make Michigan the #1 most radically pro-abortion state in America, more so than California.
• Being a Constitutional Amendment, this would make all of this a Constitutional “right”, making it nearly impossible for any Republican Legislature or Governor to undo it.
This Proposal is being dishonestly advertised as merely “Making Michigan Pro-Choice” and “making Michigan how it was before Roe v Wade was overturned”. THIS IS A LIE.
During Roe v Wade, all of the above common-sense restrictions were in place in Michigan. If Proposal 3 passes, these restrictions all go away. Polls consistently show that most
“pro-choice” people support these basic restrictions and oppose unrestricted abortion through all 9 months. That’s what Proposal 3 does. It does NOT merely revert us back to “how things were under Roe v Wade”.
Great website explaining the truth about Michigan’s pro-abortion Proposal 3.
Here is the exact Proposal 3 verbiage that will appear in the Michigan Constitution.
Important:The 95 words that appear on the Proposal 3 ballot are notthe same 343 words that will actually be permanently written into the Michigan Constitution.
Here are those 343 words: (Bold added by me)
ARTICLE I
DECLARATION OF RIGHTS
§ 28 Reproductive freedom.
(1) Every individual has a fundamental right to reproductive freedom, which entails the right to make and effectuate decisions about all matters relating to pregnancy, including but not limited to prenatal care, childbirth, postpartum care, contraception, sterilization, abortion care, miscarriage management, and infertility care.
An individual’s right to reproductive freedom shall not be denied,
burdened, nor infringed upon unless justified by a compelling state
interest achieved by the least restrictive means.
Notwithstanding the above, the state may regulate the provision of abortion care after fetal viability, provided that in no circumstance shall the state prohibit an abortion that, in the professional judgment of an attending health care professional, is medically indicated to protect the life or
physical or mental health of the pregnant individual.
(2) The state shall not discriminate in the protection or enforcement of this fundamental right.
(3) The state shall not penalize, prosecute, or otherwise take adverse
action against an individual based on their actual, potential, perceived, or alleged pregnancy outcomes, including but not limited to miscarriage,
stillbirth, or abortion. Nor shall the state penalize, prosecute, or otherwise take adverse action against someone for aiding or assisting a pregnant
individual in exercising their right to reproductive freedom with their
voluntary consent.
(4) For the purposes of this section: A state interest is “compelling” only if it is for the limited purpose of protecting the health of an individual seeking
care, consistent with accepted clinical standards of practice and
evidence based medicine, and does not infringe on that individual’s
autonomous decision making.
“Fetal viability” means: the point in pregnancy when, in the professional judgment of an attending health care professional and based on the
particular facts of the case, there is a significant likelihood of the fetus’s sustained survival outside the uterus without the application of
extraordinary medical measures.
(5) This section shall be self executing. Any provision of this section held invalid shall be severable from the remaining portions of this section.
Bob: Okay folks, that is the actual language that will appear in the Michigan Constitution if
Proposal 3 passes.
Remember, PROPOSAL 3: Mandates unrestricted abortion on demand up to the moment of birth
It eliminates all restrictions on abortion.
As quoted directly from Article 1, Section 28, which would be added to the Michigan Constitution….
The language specifically states that “every individual” (with no age minimum) “has a fundamental right to reproductive freedom, which entails the right to make an effectuate decisions about ALL matters relating to pregnancy”, and that this right “shall not be denied, burdened or infringed upon”.
Also, “The State shall not penalize, prosecute, or otherwise take adverse action against an individual based on their actual, potential, perceived, or alleged pregnancy outcomes”, or “against someone for aiding or assisting”. It also states that no law on “anything related to pregnancy” can infringe on a person’s “autonomous decision making”.
This would invalidate all existing Michigan abortion restriction laws such as Parental consent, waiting periods, informed consent, 3rd trimester bans, etc.
As a result of this proposal, thereby removing all abortion restrictions…..
Abortion centers would be allowed to set their OWN standards for health, safety and sanitation.
Untrained, non-medical persons would now be allowed to participate in abortions.
Babies that survive an abortion could be denied medical care if the woman and abortionist agree.
Christian doctors would lose their conscience rights to opt out of doing abortions.
Pro-abortion teachers would be allowed to take minors to get an abortion without telling mom or dad.
Statutory rape reporting would no longer be required.
Pregnant employees could now be discriminated against by pro-abortion employers.
Pregnant women would have and absolute right no make ANY decisions regarding pregnancy
……at any age with no minimum age restrictions.
The language would also apply to transgender surgery for minors, against the wishes of parents.
This would make Michigan the #1 most radically pro-abortion state in America, more so than California.
Being a Constitutional Amendment, this would make all of this a Constitutional “right”, making it nearly impossible for any Republican Legislature of Governor to undo it.
This Proposal is being dishonestly advertised as merely “Making Michigan Pro-Choice” and
“making Michigan how it was before Roe v Wade was overturned”. This is a lie. During Roe v Wade, all of the above common-sense restrictions were in place in Michigan. If Proposal 3 passes, these restrictions all go away. Polls consistently show that most “pro-choice” people support these basic restrictions and oppose unrestricted abortion through all 9 months. That’s what Proposal 3 does. It does NOT merely revert us back to “how things were under Roe v Wade”.
21 minute Video: A lawyer & a Doctor fact-checking 10 false claims about Proposal 3:
I took the entire news hour to explain Proposal 3 and correct the lies being told in support of it.
Here’s the 3 Michigan Proposals and why I’m a “No” vote on all 3:
PROPOSAL 1: Re-writes Michigan’s Term Limits Laws
Allows State Senators and Legislators to run a full 12 years in either Chamber, instead of the current Term Limit of 8 years in the Senate and 6 years in the House. While it lowers the overall combined Term Limits from 14 total combined years down to 12, most State politicians don’t actually serve full terms in both Chambers, so it serves to allow career politicians to stay in their current seat way longer than before. The Proposal is
deceptively written though to make it look like the average Term is being shortened.
PROPOSAL 2: Re-writes Michigan’s Voter Laws
This would change Michigan’s voter laws through a Constitutional Amendment to mimic California and make it way easier for Democrats to engage on voter fraud by:
Banning voter ID requirements
Expands Absentee & Mass Balloting that invites voter fraud
Places Drop Boxes throughout Michigan that invite voter fraud
Allows special interest and non-profit money to buy elections.
(Pro-life and Christian non-profits have way less money than the liberal non-profit groups of George Soros, Bill Gates, Hollywood, powerful unions, etc. All these groups would be able to flood Michigan elections with their money from all over the country)
Adds 9 days of early voting, an advantage to Democrats and fraud activists.
This would amend the Michigan Constitution, making it nearly impossible for a
Republican Secretary of State, Legislature, or Governor to undo it.
Strongly supported by the ACLU and the Democratic Party. (Need I say more)
PROPOSAL 3: Mandates unrestricted abortion on demand up to the moment of birth
It eliminates all restrictions on abortion.
As quoted directly from Article 1, Section 28, which would be added to the Michigan Constitution….
The language specifically states that “every individual” (with no age minimum) “has a fundamental right to reproductive freedom, which entails the right to make an effectuate decisions about ALL matters relating to pregnancy”, and that this right “shall not be denied, burdened or infringed upon”.
Also, “The State shall not penalize, prosecute, or otherwise take adverse action against an individual based on their actual, potential, perceived, or alleged pregnancy outcomes”, or “against someone for aiding or assisting”. It also states that no law on “anything related to pregnancy” can infringe on a person’s “autonomous decision making”.
This would invalidate all existing Michigan abortion restriction laws such as Parental consent, waiting periods, informed consent, 3rd trimester bans, etc.
As a result of this proposal, thereby removing all abortion restrictions…..
Abortion centers would be allowed to set their OWN standards for health, safety and sanitation.
Untrained, non-medical persons would now be allowed to participate in abortions.
Babies that survive an abortion could be denied medical care if the woman and abortionist agree.
Christian doctors would lose their conscience rights to opt out of doing abortions.
Pro-abortion teachers would be allowed to take minors to get an abortion without telling mom or dad.
Statutory rape reporting would no longer be required.
Pregnant employees could now be discriminated against by pro-abortion employers.
Pregnant women would have and absolute right no make ANY decisions regarding pregnancy
……at any age with no minimum age restrictions.
The language would also apply to transgender surgery for minors, against the wishes of parents.
This would make Michigan the #1 most radically pro-abortion state in America, more so than California.
Being a Constitutional Amendment, this would make all of this a Constitutional “right”, making it nearly impossible for any Republican Legislature of Governor to undo it.
This Proposal is being dishonestly advertised as merely “Making Michigan Pro-Choice” and
“making Michigan how it was before Roe v Wade was overturned”. This is a lie. During Roe v Wade, all of the above common-sense restrictions were in place in Michigan. If Proposal 3 passes, these restrictions all go away. Polls consistently show that most “pro-choice” people support these basic restrictions and oppose unrestricted abortion through all 9 months. That’s what Proposal 3 does. It does NOT merely revert us back to “how things were under Roe v Wade”.
21 minute Video: A lawyer & a Doctor fact-checking 10 false claims about Proposal 3:
Here is the exact Proposal 3 verbiage that will appear in the Michigan Constitution.
Important:The 95 words that appear on the Proposal 3 ballot are notthe same 343 words that will actually be permanently written into the Michigan Constitution.
Here are those 343 words: (Bold added by me)
ARTICLE I
DECLARATION OF RIGHTS
§ 28 Reproductive freedom.
(1) Every individual has a fundamental right to reproductive freedom, which entails the right to make and effectuate decisions about all matters relating to pregnancy, including but not limited to prenatal care, childbirth, postpartum care, contraception, sterilization, abortion care, miscarriage management, and infertility care.
An individual’s right to reproductive freedom shall not be denied,
burdened, nor infringed upon unless justified by a compelling state
interest achieved by the least restrictive means.
Notwithstanding the above, the state may regulate the provision of abortion care after fetal viability, provided that in no circumstance shall the state prohibit an abortion that, in the professional judgment of an attending health care professional, is medically indicated to protect the life or
physical or mental health of the pregnant individual.
(2) The state shall not discriminate in the protection or enforcement of this fundamental right.
(3) The state shall not penalize, prosecute, or otherwise take adverse
action against an individual based on their actual, potential, perceived, or alleged pregnancy outcomes, including but not limited to miscarriage,
stillbirth, or abortion. Nor shall the state penalize, prosecute, or otherwise take adverse action against someone for aiding or assisting a pregnant
individual in exercising their right to reproductive freedom with their
voluntary consent.
(4) For the purposes of this section: A state interest is “compelling” only if it is for the limited purpose of protecting the health of an individual seeking
care, consistent with accepted clinical standards of practice and
evidence based medicine, and does not infringe on that individual’s
autonomous decision making.
“Fetal viability” means: the point in pregnancy when, in the professional judgment of an attending health care professional and based on the
particular facts of the case, there is a significant likelihood of the fetus’s sustained survival outside the uterus without the application of
extraordinary medical measures.
(5) This section shall be self executing. Any provision of this section held invalid shall be severable from the remaining portions of this section.
Bob: Okay folks, that is the actual language that will appear in the Michigan Constitution if
Proposal 3 passes.
Remember, PROPOSAL 3: Mandates unrestricted abortion on demand up to the moment of birth
It eliminates all restrictions on abortion.
As quoted directly from Article 1, Section 28, which would be added to the Michigan Constitution….
The language specifically states that “every individual” (with no age minimum) “has a fundamental right to reproductive freedom, which entails the right to make an effectuate decisions about ALL matters relating to pregnancy”, and that this right “shall not be denied, burdened or infringed upon”.
Also, “The State shall not penalize, prosecute, or otherwise take adverse action against an individual based on their actual, potential, perceived, or alleged pregnancy outcomes”, or “against someone for aiding or assisting”. It also states that no law on “anything related to pregnancy” can infringe on a person’s “autonomous decision making”.
This would invalidate all existing Michigan abortion restriction laws such as Parental consent, waiting periods, informed consent, 3rd trimester bans, etc.
As a result of this proposal, thereby removing all abortion restrictions…..
Abortion centers would be allowed to set their OWN standards for health, safety and sanitation.
Untrained, non-medical persons would now be allowed to participate in abortions.
Babies that survive an abortion could be denied medical care if the woman and abortionist agree.
Christian doctors would lose their conscience rights to opt out of doing abortions.
Pro-abortion teachers would be allowed to take minors to get an abortion without telling mom or dad.
Statutory rape reporting would no longer be required.
Pregnant employees could now be discriminated against by pro-abortion employers.
Pregnant women would have and absolute right no make ANY decisions regarding pregnancy
……at any age with no minimum age restrictions.
The language would also apply to transgender surgery for minors, against the wishes of parents.
This would make Michigan the #1 most radically pro-abortion state in America, more so than California.
Being a Constitutional Amendment, this would make all of this a Constitutional “right”, making it nearly impossible for any Republican Legislature of Governor to undo it.
This Proposal is being dishonestly advertised as merely “Making Michigan Pro-Choice” and
“making Michigan how it was before Roe v Wade was overturned”. This is a lie. During Roe v Wade, all of the above common-sense restrictions were in place in Michigan. If Proposal 3 passes, these restrictions all go away. Polls consistently show that most “pro-choice” people support these basic restrictions and oppose unrestricted abortion through all 9 months. That’s what Proposal 3 does. It does NOT merely revert us back to “how things were under Roe v Wade”.
21 minute Video: A lawyer & a Doctor fact-checking 10 false claims about Proposal 3:
Guest Interview: Michigan Secretary of State Candidate Kristina Karamo.
Guest Interview: Dinesh D’Souza to discuss his book “2000 Mules: They Thought We’d Never Find Out. They Were Wrong”.
Guest Interview: Prophecy expert Terry James to discuss his book “Trajectory: Tracking the Approaching Tribulation Storm”.
Other Issues Discussed…..
I continued my apologetics series on Explaining Ghosts, UFOs and the Paranormal,
today focusing on psychics and fortune tellers.
Here’s the 3 Michigan Proposals and why I’m a “No” vote on all 3:
PROPOSAL 1: Re-writes Michigan’s Term Limits Laws
Allows State Senators and Legislators to run a full 12 years in either Chamber, instead of the current Term Limit of 8 years in the Senate and 6 years in the House. While it lowers the overall combined Term Limits from 14 total combined years down to 12, most State politicians don’t actually serve full terms in both Chambers, so it serves to allow career politicians to stay in their current seat way longer than before. The Proposal is
deceptively written though to make it look like the average Term is being shortened.
PROPOSAL 2: Re-writes Michigan’s Voter Laws
This would change Michigan’s voter laws through a Constitutional Amendment to mimic California and make it way easier for Democrats to engage on voter fraud by:
Banning voter ID requirements
Expands Absentee & Mass Balloting that invites voter fraud
Places Drop Boxes throughout Michigan that invite voter fraud
Allows special interest and non-profit money to buy elections.
(Pro-life and Christian non-profits have way less money than the liberal non-profit groups of George Soros, Bill Gates, Hollywood, powerful unions, etc. All these groups would be able to flood Michigan elections with their money from all over the country)
Adds 9 days of early voting, an advantage to Democrats and fraud activists.
This would amend the Michigan Constitution, making it nearly impossible for a
Republican Secretary of State, Legislature, or Governor to undo it.
Strongly supported by the ACLU and the Democratic Party. (Need I say more)
PROPOSAL 3: Mandates unrestricted abortion on demand up to the moment of birth
It eliminates all restrictions on abortion.
As quoted directly from Article 1, Section 28, which would be added to the Michigan Constitution….
The language specifically states that “every individual” (with no age minimum) “has a fundamental right to reproductive freedom, which entails the right to make an effectuate decisions about ALL matters relating to pregnancy”, and that this right “shall not be denied, burdened or infringed upon”.
Also, “The State shall not penalize, prosecute, or otherwise take adverse action against an individual based on their actual, potential, perceived, or alleged pregnancy outcomes”, or “against someone for aiding or assisting”. It also states that no law on “anything related to pregnancy” can infringe on a person’s “autonomous decision making”.
This would invalidate all existing Michigan abortion restriction laws such as Parental consent, waiting periods, informed consent, 3rd trimester bans, etc.
As a result of this proposal, thereby removing all abortion restrictions…..
Abortion centers would be allowed to set their OWN standards for health, safety and sanitation.
Untrained, non-medical persons would now be allowed to participate in abortions.
Babies that survive an abortion could be denied medical care if the woman and abortionist agree.
Christian doctors would lose their conscience rights to opt out of doing abortions.
Pro-abortion teachers would be allowed to take minors to get an abortion without telling mom or dad.
Statutory rape reporting would no longer be required.
Pregnant employees could now be discriminated against by pro-abortion employers.
Pregnant women would have and absolute right no make ANY decisions regarding pregnancy
……at any age with no minimum age restrictions.
The language would also apply to transgender surgery for minors, against the wishes of parents.
This would make Michigan the #1 most radically pro-abortion state in America, more so than California.
Being a Constitutional Amendment, this would make all of this a Constitutional “right”, making it nearly impossible for any Republican Legislature of Governor to undo it.
This Proposal is being dishonestly advertised as merely “Making Michigan Pro-Choice” and
“making Michigan how it was before Roe v Wade was overturned”. This is a lie. During Roe v Wade, all of the above common-sense restrictions were in place in Michigan. If Proposal 3 passes, these restrictions all go away. Polls consistently show that most “pro-choice” people support these basic restrictions and oppose unrestricted abortion through all 9 months. That’s what Proposal 3 does. It does NOT merely revert us back to “how things were under Roe v Wade”.
21 minute Video: A lawyer & a Doctor fact-checking 10 false claims about Proposal 3:
